<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to infuse Social Content 2.0 into your social software lifecycle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stevenmilstein.com/2009/02/09/how-to-infuse-social-content-20-into-your-social-software-lifecycle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stevenmilstein.com/2009/02/09/how-to-infuse-social-content-20-into-your-social-software-lifecycle/</link>
	<description>Onboarding folks onto social software, 10 minutes at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:18:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lessons learned from Social Content 2.0 Circle of Life - Part 3 &#124; Steven Milstein's Blog</title>
		<link>http://stevenmilstein.com/2009/02/09/how-to-infuse-social-content-20-into-your-social-software-lifecycle/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Lessons learned from Social Content 2.0 Circle of Life - Part 3 &#124; Steven Milstein's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevenmilstein.com/blog/?p=803#comment-67</guid>
		<description>[...] How to infuse Social Content 2.0 into your social software lifecycle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How to infuse Social Content 2.0 into your social software lifecycle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lessons learned from Social Content 2.0 Circle of Life - Part 3 &#124; Steven Milstein's Blog</title>
		<link>http://stevenmilstein.com/2009/02/09/how-to-infuse-social-content-20-into-your-social-software-lifecycle/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Lessons learned from Social Content 2.0 Circle of Life - Part 3 &#124; Steven Milstein's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevenmilstein.com/blog/?p=803#comment-99</guid>
		<description>[...] How to infuse Social Content 2.0 into your social software lifecycle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How to infuse Social Content 2.0 into your social software lifecycle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Arbour</title>
		<link>http://stevenmilstein.com/2009/02/09/how-to-infuse-social-content-20-into-your-social-software-lifecycle/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Arbour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevenmilstein.com/blog/?p=803#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Interesting topic and thread. One point you did not identify but bears mention is that the reason why many of the social content companies are small is exactly because social interactions are hard to monetize. Sure, you can build a company to support a product (like Acquia), just charge for it (like Atlassian), develop subscriber-based revenue streams with SaaS-based delivery models (like Six Apart), or give it away in hopes of improving your brand and making money elsewhere (like Microsoft). But most of these business models have a hard time delivering the requisite funding to support size, and inevitably the role of Community Product Manager.

I think you&#039;re totally right about the value of the position and my experience in Product Management is that successful products always work better when you can integrate the development process with a user community. However, paying for both roles with two separate employees is a challenge for many small companies. Until social content companies find more lucrative ways to monetize social interactions, the role of Community Product Manager will be a shared activity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting topic and thread. One point you did not identify but bears mention is that the reason why many of the social content companies are small is exactly because social interactions are hard to monetize. Sure, you can build a company to support a product (like Acquia), just charge for it (like Atlassian), develop subscriber-based revenue streams with SaaS-based delivery models (like Six Apart), or give it away in hopes of improving your brand and making money elsewhere (like Microsoft). But most of these business models have a hard time delivering the requisite funding to support size, and inevitably the role of Community Product Manager.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re totally right about the value of the position and my experience in Product Management is that successful products always work better when you can integrate the development process with a user community. However, paying for both roles with two separate employees is a challenge for many small companies. Until social content companies find more lucrative ways to monetize social interactions, the role of Community Product Manager will be a shared activity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lessons learned from Social Content 2.0 Circle of Life - Part 2 &#124; Steven Milstein's Blog</title>
		<link>http://stevenmilstein.com/2009/02/09/how-to-infuse-social-content-20-into-your-social-software-lifecycle/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Lessons learned from Social Content 2.0 Circle of Life - Part 2 &#124; Steven Milstein's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevenmilstein.com/blog/?p=803#comment-68</guid>
		<description>[...] an earlier post, How to infuse Social Content 2.0 into your social software lifecycle, I reiterated a common theme I noticed in Gartnerâ€™s Magic Quadrant for Social Software. That [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an earlier post, How to infuse Social Content 2.0 into your social software lifecycle, I reiterated a common theme I noticed in Gartnerâ€™s Magic Quadrant for Social Software. That [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lessons learned from Social Content 2.0 Circle of Life - Part 2 &#124; Steven Milstein's Blog</title>
		<link>http://stevenmilstein.com/2009/02/09/how-to-infuse-social-content-20-into-your-social-software-lifecycle/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Lessons learned from Social Content 2.0 Circle of Life - Part 2 &#124; Steven Milstein's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevenmilstein.com/blog/?p=803#comment-100</guid>
		<description>[...] an earlier post, How to infuse Social Content 2.0 into your social software lifecycle, I reiterated a common theme I noticed in Gartnerâ€™s Magic Quadrant for Social Software. That [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an earlier post, How to infuse Social Content 2.0 into your social software lifecycle, I reiterated a common theme I noticed in Gartnerâ€™s Magic Quadrant for Social Software. That [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lessons learnt from Social Content 2.0 Circle of Life - Part 1 &#124; Steven Milstein's Blog</title>
		<link>http://stevenmilstein.com/2009/02/09/how-to-infuse-social-content-20-into-your-social-software-lifecycle/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Lessons learnt from Social Content 2.0 Circle of Life - Part 1 &#124; Steven Milstein's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 20:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevenmilstein.com/blog/?p=803#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] an earlier post, How to infuse Social Content 2.0 into your social software lifecycle, I reiterated Gartner&#8217;s findings that many social software providers / vendors may suffer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an earlier post, How to infuse Social Content 2.0 into your social software lifecycle, I reiterated Gartner&#8217;s findings that many social software providers / vendors may suffer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lessons learnt from Social Content 2.0 Circle of Life - Part 1 &#124; Steven Milstein's Blog</title>
		<link>http://stevenmilstein.com/2009/02/09/how-to-infuse-social-content-20-into-your-social-software-lifecycle/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Lessons learnt from Social Content 2.0 Circle of Life - Part 1 &#124; Steven Milstein's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 20:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevenmilstein.com/blog/?p=803#comment-97</guid>
		<description>[...] an earlier post, How to infuse Social Content 2.0 into your social software lifecycle, I reiterated Gartner&#8217;s findings that many social software providers / vendors may suffer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an earlier post, How to infuse Social Content 2.0 into your social software lifecycle, I reiterated Gartner&#8217;s findings that many social software providers / vendors may suffer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trial offer to test the Social Content 2.0 Circle of Life &#124; Steven Milstein's Blog</title>
		<link>http://stevenmilstein.com/2009/02/09/how-to-infuse-social-content-20-into-your-social-software-lifecycle/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Trial offer to test the Social Content 2.0 Circle of Life &#124; Steven Milstein's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevenmilstein.com/blog/?p=803#comment-62</guid>
		<description>[...] of Life Background I recently posted How to infuse Social Content 2.0 into your social software lifecycle where I mentioned 38 social software companies reviewed in the Gartner Magic Quadrant. I then went [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Life Background I recently posted How to infuse Social Content 2.0 into your social software lifecycle where I mentioned 38 social software companies reviewed in the Gartner Magic Quadrant. I then went [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trial offer to test the Social Content 2.0 Circle of Life &#124; Steven Milstein's Blog</title>
		<link>http://stevenmilstein.com/2009/02/09/how-to-infuse-social-content-20-into-your-social-software-lifecycle/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Trial offer to test the Social Content 2.0 Circle of Life &#124; Steven Milstein's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevenmilstein.com/blog/?p=803#comment-98</guid>
		<description>[...] of Life Background I recently posted How to infuse Social Content 2.0 into your social software lifecycle where I mentioned 38 social software companies reviewed in the Gartner Magic Quadrant. I then went [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Life Background I recently posted How to infuse Social Content 2.0 into your social software lifecycle where I mentioned 38 social software companies reviewed in the Gartner Magic Quadrant. I then went [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Milstein</title>
		<link>http://stevenmilstein.com/2009/02/09/how-to-infuse-social-content-20-into-your-social-software-lifecycle/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Milstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stevenmilstein.com/blog/?p=803#comment-59</guid>
		<description>@vassko I thank you for revisiting &amp; re-commenting.  I&#039;ll be following up with to see what I can do to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@vassko I thank you for revisiting &#038; re-commenting.  I&#8217;ll be following up with to see what I can do to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
